For information
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 6, 19th June 2008
|
Communication to ITU-T Q6/15 from IETF's CCAMP Working Group on Lambda Switch Capable Equipment
For information |
Communication received from the OIF, 29th May 2008
|
Liaison to IETF on G.7715.1 Routing Requirements
Response advisable - no date set |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14, 18th March 2008
|
Response to your review of RFC 4258 and RFC 4652
In response to received liaison |
Liaisons received from the ITU-T Study Group 15, 29th February 2008
|
GMPLS Signaling on VCAT/LCAS (includes comments on GMPLS Calls)
In response to our liaison For Action: Response requested by 15th September 2008 |
|
ITU-T SG15 OTNT Standardization Work Plan
Link to the work plan. For Comment: Response requested by 31st October 2008 |
|
ITU-T Q14/15 response to IETF CCAMP request for review of RFC 4258 and RFC 4652
Attachment In response to our liaison For Action: Response requested by 15th September 2008 Response sent 18th March 2008 |
Liaison received from the ITU-T Study Group 15, 29th February 2008
|
Copied on a liaison to the Routing ADs and the IAB
Request for forming an IETF Exploratory Working Group on ASON Issues Response requested by 15th September 2008 |
Communication received from the OIF, 14th February 2008
|
Liaison to IETF CCAMP WG
Response requested - no date set Attached PowerPoint slides |
Liaisons sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14, 1st February 2008
|
Respnse to Your Liaison on GMPLS Calls
In response to received communication. |
|
Response to Liaison on GMPLS Signaling for VCAT/LCAS
Response requested by 5th March 2008 In response to received communication. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 9, 29th January 2008
|
Response to Your Liaison on T-MPLS Ring Protection
In response to received communication. |
Communication sent to the OIF, 3rd January 2008
|
Response to Your Questions about GMPLS Protocol Usage
In response to received communication. |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 9 (December 2007).
The following liaison has been received. Also sent to MPLS, PWE3, and L2VPN
|
T-MPLS Ring Protection
Word copy of liaison with attached document
For comment. Response requested by 11th February 2008. Response sent 29th January 2008. |
Communication received from the OIF, 29th November 2007
|
Liaison to IETF Regarding 2007 Interop Test Findings
Response requested by 20th January 2008 Response sent 3rd January 2008 |
Communication received from the OIF, 28th November 2007
|
Liaison to IETF CCAMP WG on VCAT/LCAS Requirements |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 16th November 2007
|
ASON Routing Loop Prevention Mechanism
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to the MFA, 16th October 2007
|
Liaison response: IETF CCAMP Liaison to MFA Forum on MPLS-ICI specification during straw-ballot
In response to received liaison |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Questions 12 and 14 (Stuttgart, September 2007).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison Statement to CCAMP WG on GMPLS Signaling for VCAT/LCAS
Data tracker link.
For action. Response requested by 4th February 2008 Respnse sent 1st February 2008 |
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on ASON Routing Loop Prevention
Data tracker link.
For action. Response requested by 19th November 2007 Response sent 16th November 2007 |
|
Liaison Statement to CCAMP on GMPLS Calls
Data tracker link.
For action. Response requested by 4th February 2008 Respnse sent 1st February 2008 |
|
Liaison Statement to CCAMP on Multi-Layer Network I-Ds
Data tracker link.
In response to our liaison. No response is required. |
Liaison received from the MFA, 7th September 2007
|
Liaison to IETF (ccamp, MPLS, BFD, PWE3, and L3VPN) on MFA Forum MPLS ICI
Attachment in PDF Straw Ballot Text for MPLS InterCarrier Interconnect Technical Specification For action. Response desired by 18th October 2007. Response sent 16th October 2007. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 4th September 2007
|
GMPLS Signaling for VCAT/LCAS
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 3rd September 2007
|
ASON Routing Loop Prevention Mechanism
In response to received liaison. |
Communication received from the OIF, 1st September 2007
|
Liaison to IETF CCAMP WG on MEF services support |
Liaison received from the MFA, 31st August 2007
|
Liaison response to to IETF ccamp WG on MFA Forum MPLS CNI
Attachment in Microsoft Word MFA Forum Packet Based GMPLS Client to Network Interconnect (CNI) |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 25th August 2007
|
In answer to your questions on GMPLS Calls
In response to received liaison. |
Liaisons sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 22nd August 2007
|
Your OTNT Work Plan
In response to received liaison. |
|
Multi-Region and Multi-Layer Networking
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 5th August 2007
|
Re-review of ASON Routing Requirements
For comment. Response requested by 27th February 2008 Response received |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 2nd August 2007
|
New RFCs Published as of 1st August 2007 |
Liaison received from IEEE, 24th July 2007
|
GMPLS Control of 802.1Qay Networks
In response to our liaison. |
ITU-T Study Group 15 (Geneva, June 2007).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
SG15 OTNT Standardization Work Plan
Data tracker link.
For comment. Response requested by 31st December 2007 Response sent 22nd August 2007 |
|
Reply to IETF CCAMP Liaison "GMPLS Calls"
Data tracker link.
For comment. Response requested by 28th January 2008 Response sent 25th August 2007 |
|
Reply to IETF CCAMP Liaison "VCAT/LCAS Work in CCAMP"
Data tracker link.
For information. No response is required. |
|
Loop Prevention Mechanisms
Data tracker link.
For action. Response required by 1st September 2007 Response sent 3rd September 2007 |
|
Cooperative Relationship between ITU-T SG15 and CCAMP
Data tracker link.
For information. No response is required. |
Liaison to IEEE 802.1 (June 2007)
We send the following liaison to the IEEE 802.1.
|
GMPLS Control of 802.1Qay Networks
We requested a response by 19th July 2007. Response received |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (May 2007).
The following liaison has been received.
|
Follow up Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on Multi-Layer Networking
Data tracker link.
For action. Response required by 1st September 2007. Response sent 22nd August 2007 |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14, 2nd May 2007
|
GMPLS Calls
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14, 6th May 2007
|
Loop Prevention Mechanisms in OSPF for ASON Networks
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 3, 28th April 2007
|
SG15 OTNT Standardisation Work Plane
In response to received liaison. |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (Chicago, April 2007).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on Call/Connection Separation in ASON and GMPLS
Data tracker link.
For information. No response required |
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on Multi-Layer Networking
Data tracker link.
For information. No response required |
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on VCAT/LCAS Signalling
Data tracker link.
For action. Response required by 28th May 2007 Response sent 4th September 2007 |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 8th April 2007
|
Cooperative Relationship between ITU-T SG15 and CCAMP
In response to received liaison. |
Liaisons sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 4th April 2007
|
Call/Connection Separation in ASON and GMPLS
In response to received liaison. |
|
Multi-Layer Networking (MLN) Work in CCAMP
In response to received liaison. |
|
VCAT/LCAS Work in CCAMP
In response to received liaison. |
Liaison sent to ITU-T Study Group 15, 30th March 2007
|
New CCAMP RFCs Published |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (Darmstadt, March 2007).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison statement to ccamp regarding work on calls and Vcat/LCAS
Data tracker link.
For action. Response required by 2nd April 2007 Responses
| ||||||||
|
Liaison Statement responding to ccamp liaison of 21 February 2007
Data tracker link.
For action. Responses required by 6th April 2007 Responses
|
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (28th February 2007).
|
Further Information Regarding VLAN ID Requirements.
Response requested.
|
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (7th December 2006).
|
OIF liaison letter regarding Carrier WG Requirements Document.
(No CCAMP action required)
|
IEEE 802.1
The liaison has been received from the IEEE 802.1 (22nd November 2006).
|
Response to our liaison requesting clarification on VLAN tag translation
(No CCAMP action is required.) |
ITU-T Study Group 15 (Geneva, November 2006).
The following liaisons has been received.
|
Consented ASON Documents
Full liaison as Microsoft Word with embedded attachments. (No CCAMP action is required.) |
|
Label Value Table in G.8112
Full liaison as Microsoft Word. (No CCAMP action is required.) |
|
SG15 OTNT Standardization Work Plan
Full liaison as Microsoft Word with embedded attachments. Response sent 28th April 2007 |
|
Response to our liaison on current ASON work in CCAMP
This liaison contains a detailed review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-02.txt Full liaison as Microsoft Word. Response sent 21st February 2007 |
MFA.
The following correspondence has been received from the MFA (14th November 2006).
|
Liaision to IETF ccamp on MFA Forum MPLS CNI. Response sent 30th November 2006
|
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (25th October 2006).
|
RSVP Signaling for MEF services. Response requested | ||||||
|
Update to IETF CCAMP on Networking Projects in OIF.
|
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (Generated by correspondence, October 2006).
We have been copied on the following liaison to the OIF.
|
Response to Liaison Statement (oif2006.258.02) on Call/Connection Deletion
Data tracker link.
(No CCAMP action is required.) |
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (9th August 2006).
|
CCAMP draft on MEF Ethernet Traffic Parameters. Response sent 15th October 2006 |
|
CCAMP Comments on Routing Document. Reply to our comments on E-NNI. (No response required) |
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (9th June 2006).
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (2nd June 2006).
It replaces / supplements the correspondence on the same topic received on 20th May 2006.
|
Liaison to IETF CCAMP WG on 1:N Protection. Response sent 26th June 2006 |
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (20th May 2006).
|
Liaison to IETF CCAMP WG on 1:N Protection (Obsoleted by 2nd June 2006)
Attachment in the form of PowerPoint slides |
|
Use of RSVP to support Ethernet Access. Response sent 15th June 2006, and response sent 26th July 2006 |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (Kobe, April 2006).
The following liaison has been received.
|
ASON control plane session security
Data tracker link.
Copy on liaison to Security Area Directors. Response sent 26th July 2006 (No CCAMP action is required.) |
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (8th February 2006).
|
Thanks for CCAMP Liaison (No action required) |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Joint Question 12 and Question 14 (Naperville, November 2005).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Control plane resilience
Data tracker link.
(Informational liaison. No action is required.)
| ||
|
Connection migration Data tracker link. (Informational liaison. No action is required.) | ||
|
ASON-related work Data tracker link. (For action) Response sent 16th Jan 2006. | ||
|
ASON lexicography Data tracker link. (For comment) Response sent 16th Jan 2006. |
OIF.
The following correspondence has been received from the OIF (24th October 2005).
|
Follow up questions concerning GMPLS parameters. (No action required) |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 (Stuttgart, July 2005).
We have been copied on the following liaison to the OIF.
|
Response Liaison Statement to OIF on OIF Demo Finding (No action is required.) |
OIF.
Although there is no formal liaison relationship, the following liaison has been received.
|
Liaison to IETF on Demo Findings. (Replied 27th September) |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Full Meeting (Geneva, May 2005).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison Statement to CCAMP on Crankback (Informational) | ||||
|
Draft G.7714 Revision (Informational)
| ||||
|
Reply to Evaluation of IETF Routing Protocols in the Context of ASON (Informational)
| ||||
|
Q12 and Q14 Reply to liaison on GMPLS/ASON Lexicography (Replied 27th July)
| ||||
|
Q3 Reply on GMPLS/ASON Lexicography (Replied 3rd June) | ||||
|
Liaison on OTNT Standardization Work Plan (Replied 11th July)
|
OIF.
Although there is no formal liaison relationship, the following liaison has been received.
|
New project to document the OIF requirements for Neighbor Discovery. |
ITU-T Study Group 13 Question 2 (Geneva, 25 April - 6 May 2005) .
The following liaison has been received.
|
L1VPN related work collaboration |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 3.
The following liaison has been received.
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP WG on G.8081: Terms and definitions for ASON
|
ITU-T Study Group 15 Joint Q12 and Q14 Interim Meeting (China, March 2005).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP WG on RFC 4003 |
|
Liaison Statement to ccamp and mpls WGs on (G)MPLS Change Process |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Interim Meeting (Holmdel, Jaunary 24-28, 2005).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP WG on Crankback in GMPLS Systems |
|
Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP WG on the Comparison of LMP and ASON Discovery |
ITU-T Study Group 13 Full Meeting (Geneva, December 7 - 17, 2004).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Reply to IETF CCAMP working group on RSVP modification |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Full Meeting (Geneva, November 29 - December 3, 2004).
The following liaisons have been received.
|
Crankback in GMPLS Systems | ||
|
Response to IETF CCAMP WG on Comparison of LMP and ASON Discovery
| ||
|
Response to Liaison Statement from IETF CCAMP WG on GMPLS MIB Modules
| ||
|
ASON Routing Solutions status |
OIF.
Although there is no formal liaison relationship, the following two liaisons have been received.
|
Re: IETF Response to Results from OIF World Interoperability Demo. 5 November 2004. |
|
New OIF Project on Interworking
of ASON - GMPLS Network Domains. 5 November 2004. Accompanying PowerPoint slides |
OIF.
Although there is no formal liaison relationship, the following correspondence has been received.
|
A letter regarding results of the OIF's World Interoperability Demo. 11 August 2004. |
OIF.
Although there is no formal liaison relationship, the following liaison has been received.
|
Letter in response to IETF CCAMP's correspondence of March 19 regarding OIF intra-carrier E-NNI routing work. |
ITU-T Study Group 15 Full Meeting (Geneva, April 19 - 30, 2004).
The following liaison has been received.
ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14 Rapporteur's meeting (Chicago, February 16 - 20, 2004).
The following liaisons have been received.
ITU-T Study Group 13 on the Subject of Layer One VPNs
The following liaisons have been received.